Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $232.12 vs $435.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 289 vs 269 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77230 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
39.853479853479854%
Multi-Core
3898
22.63778384342877%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |