![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Buy on Amazon
$232.12
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1589 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 28% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-3820 - 101 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $232.12 vs $349.88
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77515 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $349.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
56.70955882352941%
Multi-Core
2299
58.97896357106208%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
