Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 402 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $65.23 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77724 minutes ago
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |