Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v5 is 769 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 696 vs 619 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 80 vs 130 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 80 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |