Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1072 days newer than Xeon E3-1505M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1505M v5 - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |