Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2279 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1280 - 154 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 64 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | EPYC |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |