Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 2835 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 28% better in League of Legends than Xeon E3-1280 - 100 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
