Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 757 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E3-1280 - 132 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
