Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 840 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 168 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |