Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2751 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Apex Legends than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 293 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
293
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$495
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4986 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |