Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 238 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$521.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $521.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |