Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1936 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 174 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 28 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$397.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |