Buy on Amazon
$299
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1945 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 96% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 51 vs 26 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-7920X Tray Processor (CD8067303753300)- OEM Pack
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
