Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 160 vs 150 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$250.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $250.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |