Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2908 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 22% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 193 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |