Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1872 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 194 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 64 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | EPYC |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |