Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 350 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 45 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 2% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 262 vs 256 FPS
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
