Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5600U outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5600U is 1021 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5600U - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5600U
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 15 vs 45 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-5600U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-5600U |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
