Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1205 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1260L - 184 vs 168 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17371 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |