Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1260L outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1260L is 192 days older than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Performs up to 0% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8120 - 451 vs 449 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |