Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6300 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6300 is 377 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than FX-8120 - 208 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-8120 - $74.04 vs $78.02
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-8120 - $0.36 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |