Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 21% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E3-1260L - 130 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 12 vs 8 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |