Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1612 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1260L - 185 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 35 vs 45 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |