Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2573 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 11% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Xeon E3-1260L - 139 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 12 vs 8 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |