Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E3-1260L vs Celeron G3900

Xeon E3-1260L vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1612 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.

Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L

  • Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 45 vs 51 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 0% better in Fortnite than Xeon E3-1260L - 214 vs 213 FPS
This is a free version of Fortnite.
Fortnite

Fortnite

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

Intel Xeon E3-1260L Logo
Xeon E3-1260L

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011


FPS

213

99%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

214

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.33/FPS

100%

Price, $

$70

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel CPU BX80662G3900 Celeron G3900 2.80Ghz 2M LGA1151 2C/2T Skylake Retail

Buy for $70 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

Intel Xeon E3-1260L Logo
Xeon E3-1260L

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E3-1260L Logo
Xeon E3-1260L

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011


Single-Core

473

81%

Multi-Core

1510

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

65%

Intel Xeon E3-1260L Logo

Intel Xeon E3-1260L

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Apr 3rd, 2011Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Xeon E3CollectionCeleron
Sandy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1151
Server
Segment
Desktop
4
Cores2
8
Threads2
2.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
45 W
TDP51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
24.0xMultiplier
28.0x
Intel HD 2000Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.