Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $282
Availability
MSRP in USD: $282
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 682 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
