Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1975 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 108 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |