Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v3 is 839 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Valorant than Xeon X5690 - 749 vs 691 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 80 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Xeon X5690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon X5690 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon |
| Haswell | Codename | Westmere-EP |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
