Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3201 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon X5690 - 99 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
