Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3229 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 33% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 264 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
