Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2136 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2136 is 83 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 183 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2136 - 24 vs 12 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
180
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |