Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2468 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 17% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium P6200 - 496 vs 424 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 64 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium P6200
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Arrandale | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
