Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1443 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 23% better in Far Cry 6 than Pentium P6200 - 106 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 20 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium P6200
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
