Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3342 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Pentium P6200 - 175 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 4 vs 2 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Pentium P6200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium P6200
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Pentium | Collection | Athlon |
| Arrandale | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
