Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 2094 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Pentium P6100 - 175 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |