Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2468 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Pentium P6100 - 630 vs 582 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 64 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium P6100
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Arrandale | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
