Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1443 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium P6100 - 163 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |