Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 1443 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium P6100 - 163 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 24 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium P6100
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
