Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $47.48 vs $85.13
- Up to 34% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105F - $0.42 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G6950 - 132 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
113
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13571 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
65%
Price, $
$85.13
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |