Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 1345 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than FX-6350 - 245 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 33% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $99.99 vs $149.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Ready or Not than Pentium G4620 - $0.43 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 6 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
70.49180327868852%
Price, $
$149.99
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45299 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
235
95.91836734693877%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |