Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $149.99 vs $165.86
- Up to 1% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-11600KF - $0.69 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Fortnite than Pentium G4620 - 237 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
217
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
98%
Price, $
$165.86
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |