Buy on Amazon
$26.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 730 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $26.99 vs $109.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.1 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Pentium G4400 - 271 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz Dual-Core 2-Thread CPU Processor 3M 54W LGA 1151
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
24%
Price, $
$109.99
24%
FPS Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
