Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1952 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $109.99 vs $138.98
- Up to 17% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-13100 - $0.7 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 60 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
157
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2672 minutes ago
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |