Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1397 days newer than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 133% better in League of Legends than Pentium G3220 - 140 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 64 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G3220
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Haswell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
