Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 125 days older than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium G3220 - 512 vs 452 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G3220 - 47 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3220
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 53 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
