Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 372 days newer than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 53 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Pentium G3220 - 219 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 12 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G3220
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
