Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1437 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 4 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2200% better in Cities: Skylines II than Core M-5Y10c - 23 vs 1 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 24 vs 4 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
23
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
8.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |