Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2564 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 16% better in Lost Ark than FX-8150 - 257 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $82.02 vs $300.15
- Up to 68% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-9920X - $0.37 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
31.62393162393163%
Price, $
$300.15
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $300.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
222
86.38132295719845%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |