Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8320 - 132 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $102.02 vs $495.15
- Up to 77% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-9920X - $0.88 vs $3.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.75/FPS
23%
Price, $
$495.15
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $495.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10434 minutes ago
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |