Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 43 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Athlon 200GE - 242 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $69.99 vs $300.15
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-9920X - $0.3 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
242
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
24.193548387096772%
Price, $
$300.15
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $300.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2738 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
235
97.10743801652893%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
62.91578202406228%
Multi-Core
1857
19.66744333827579%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |